Is there a reason why you shouldn't get the Polar Vantage M2? Admittedly, if you need a hardcore running watch, you might find the Vantage M2 a tad too fashion-watch-like. Although fitness wearables are never an investment, I reckon the Vantage M2 will serve its users well for at least a good few years. The Polar Vantage M2 strikes a good balance between style and substance: it has an ample amount of features, both sport and casual, and despite all the premium features it has to offer, it doesn't cost the earth either. How does Garmin's top dog outdoor watch compare to Polar's most expensive wearable? Find out here: Polar Vantage V2 vs Garmin Fenix 6 Pro. We would certainly recommend the Polar Vantage V2 to anyone who would like to take their athletic performance to the next level: there aren't many wrist-wearables that provide as much data as this one. It would have been great to see some improvements to the user interface, especially the navigation, since the Vantage V, but what can we do? Touch controls are still a bit laggy, although the screen feels a bit more responsive than the one found on the Vantage V. ![]() Better still, most of the tests and data provided by the Vantage V2 can't be found elsewhere, making the watch all the more appealing for information-thirsty athletes. It has loads of useful tests and data for serious runners, cyclists and triathletes to better their form and get ready for races more efficiently. Its built quality is excellent, and a step up from the original Vantage V. The strap is significantly thinner than the M430 and that makes it feel less bulky on the wrist.The Polar Vantage V2 is a watch of many qualities. ![]() The watch comes in two sizes - small/medium and medium/large, with well-spaced strap perforations that should make it easy to fit most wrists. In order to make the most of Polar’s improving activity and sleep tracking features that needed to be solved. Why does this matter? While we were fans of the M430’s workout skills it wasn’t a watch you really wanted to wear all day and certainly not in bed. It weighs in at 45g, 21g lighter than the V and 6g lighter than its predecessor, the Polar M430. At 46mm wide it’s the same width as the Vantage V but comes in slightly thinner at 12.5mm. One advantage of the Vantage M’s plastic body is how light it feels. That said, we found the watch perfectly easy to control on the move but we weren’t 100% sure this was down to the anti-slip. While these have what Polar calls an ‘anti-slip’ surface that’s designed to make them easier to use on the move, they’re not as easy to operate as the slightly larger, ridge-cut metallic buttons on the V. The screen is surrounded by a stainless-steel bezel that’s black on the black watch and silver on the white and red alternative colors in the range. ![]() The centerpiece is an always-on, 240 x 240 resolution color Gorilla Glass display – the same that you’ll find on the Vantage V. The plastic body of the watch undoubtedly makes the M look a bit cheaper than the metallic Vantage V but it’s still a good-looking timepiece, for a sports watch. It’s much more refined, subtle and sophisticated than previous Polar watches. The Polar Vantage M moves away from the blocky, rectangular watch face to a more traditional round design that’s not unlike those you find in the Garmin Forerunner range. We said it in our Polar Vantage V review and it’s true of the Vantage M too, the sports watch specialist has really upped its game in the style stakes. Clear, color screen, but could be brighter.That’s a chunk more expensive than the Polar M430, which you can pick up for $199.95 / £174.50 / AU$299, but not quite up there with the Garmin Forerunner 645, which will cost you somewhere in the region of $400 / £350 / AU$550 without music. The Polar Vantage M is priced at $279.95 / £249 / AU$399. Polar Vantage M (White) at Amazon for $220.09.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |